|
The
Complexities of Intimacy
Excerpt
THE MOTHER’S MIRROR
It is commonly known that those nearest to us, those of whom we have the most
extensive, intimate knowledge, are often held at arm’s
length in our minds. The saying rolls so easily off
the tongue: "familiarity breeds contempt," and the idiom
"to take for granted" is as familiar to us as those
we do. An elaborate system inevitably-yet inadvertently-evolves
whereby we offer such permissions to each other.
Thus even as we hold our spouse’s hand, or feel
with genuine concern the tepid forehead of our firstborn,
we simultaneously regard the ridge of black under the
former’s nails, the tiny white specks that fall to his
shoulders when we smooth back his hair, and when our
eyes travel furtively down, they settle on the latter’s
scuffed, untied shoes, his toe beginning to emerge from
the leather like an egg in the very process of hatching.
The foot inside that shoe is not often idle as
we speak to the flesh of our flesh, our firstborn son,
as we speak with the intention of exchanging pleasantries,
conveying affection; to elicit tenderness, or heaven
forbid, solicit information. The foot taps; it jabs
the ground. Our reluctant interlocutor’s replies are
listless; his eyes elsewhere, anywhere but in contact
with our own.
Perhaps we keep our disappointment to ourself
or perhaps we voice it, and once articulated, it is
all too seductive to make a ritual of the words, as
if they were beads of a rosary and we gathered by each
repetition indulgences instead of alienation. As luck
would have it, any replies which we receive do no more
than inform of complications, superstitions, idiosyncrasies,
compulsions: in short, excuses. The shoes, for example,
have grown to have sentimental value; it is too unmanly
to fuss with one’s cuticles; least rational of all is
our husband’s insistence that excessive washing of the
hair may cause it in time to thin, to recede, and eventually,
to fall out. Is that what we want?
What would be the point, in the wake of such
a confrontation, in trying to address our younger daughter’s
ostentatious makeup and jewelry, the revealing bodice
of her dress-on those occasions when she does dress-or
more usually, as today, the threadbare sites on her
dungarees? From the time of her conception, we had imagined
a special closeness with our daughter: the seeking of
advice, the poignant offering of secrets, both joyful
and anxious, the sharing of that which is distinctly
feminine-at least, as we construe the word. And yet
the girl is more sullen even than her brother, less
forthcoming in our presence, mistrustful for no reason
we can possibly surmise. And if we are so bold as to
critique the company she keeps, allude to standards
of behavior, or imply that certain activities might
be less than edifying, her terse reply will put us in
our place: what can an old-fashioned housewife know
of contemporary mores, styles; advances in our culture?
This is not our business, nor our metier.
Thus, after actual or imagined encounters, all
the more frustrated, we find ourself admiring obsessively
the graceful countenance, the courteous demeanor of
our colleagues or our supervisor-granted we refer to
the part-time employment of a woman who is principally
a housewife, whose image is a fixed one, in community,
in family-but regardless of the context, we cannot turn
away our gaze from the prominent cheekbones or delicate
wrists of strangers, or cease to dwell upon the uncanny
way some women’s stockings never sag below the knee-as
ours inevitably do after only an hour of wear-or how
some stylish men manage never to display an inch of
flesh between top of sock and hem of pant. Why is that
strip of flesh so bothersome to us-appearing to glow
in the dark as he sits in the living room chair in our
home? Why do we find ourself enraptured by the sonorous
voice or elegant meaningless gestures of those we do
not harbor in our homes? We are given to imagining,
increasingly, how fulfilling life might be if it were
he or she or they whom we greeted at table every morning,
dined with every evening, perhaps by candlelight, without
the television’s ubiquitous, intrusive presence; perhaps
even held, in certain circumstances-when we allow ourself
the thought-in our embrace; the weary sequences of habit
replaced by spontaneous rather than contractual affection,
replaced by-might it ever be?-incendiary fervor?
Just take a look at yourselves, we want to cry;
just for once would you listen to yourselves, to the
persons of our household who seemed at one time to take
more pride in their appearance, to be more refined in
their behavior, more courteous, more appreciative of
ourself? For recently it seems that when an individual
is needed for any task, be it rising wearily to make
his coffee, or driving to the pharmacy for yet another
urgent errand, or cleaning out debris in the garage,
it is the hand attached to our already strained shoulder
which rises automatically to volunteer.
Yet should not one who regularly offers services,
who does one’s share, be given also certain compensations?
Should not such persons be allowed to make, occasionally,
demands? There must be some control over the degree
to which we take each other for granted. How, for instance,
have we spent this evening? With hardly a thought to
our comfort. It may be that what others think of as
necessity has been transformed in our perception into
luxury; so that, for instance, we consider it less troublesome
to ignore the fullness of our bladder than to interrupt
her cosmetic application-an at-least-once daily ritual
requiring intense concentration-or than to knock so
loudly as to be heard over the sound produced by our
firstborn when in his throat he does the internal acrobatics
of suspending flavored liquid with the intention of
freshening his breath before a visit from his girlfriend.
The sound is in fact so comical to our ears, reminding
us as it does of the gurgling of his early years, that
it increases our urgency even as we strive to ignore
the insistent pressure; we must cover our mouth with
our hand lest we laugh out loud, or worse. And we may
have to hold out longer still, for it is likely that
he has negotiated with his sister over who precedes
the other in the bathroom, and she will need to linger
long before the mirror, taking to her eyes what would
appear to be an instrument of torture, and with the
clamped end, forcing the defenseless lashes into sculpted
curl.
Not only are our physiological functions hindered
by these rituals; pragmatic matters of the house are
left on hold as well. We would like to start the laundry,
so his sweatshirt and her ragged dungarees will be available
on demand. We would like to let the dishwasher initiate
its cycle, now that we have cleared away all traces
of the repast we spent the afternoon preparing. Ingeniously
we have fit all the vessels into the wire racks of the
appliance: the pots and pans and flatware, even the
tiny plate on which we put our own supper-the full-sized
dinner plate that completes the Blue Danube pattern
china set was accidentally broken recently-his girlfriend
is our guess, but we are not so small, so petty, as
to mention it, make issue of it-and we would not want
to ask any other family member to make the sacrifice
of crowding food onto such a diminutive surface. Still
we are tentative about pressing the oval silver button
that starts the cycle, lest we alter the consistency
of our husband’s bath-known to last over an hour-or
perhaps the children’s showers are now in progress:
those pre-trysting rituals during which the steam rises
and disseminates to fog not only the bathroom mirror,
but all the windows of the house, as if our family resided
in the humidity of the tropics rather than the temperate
climate of a Northeastern suburb of the United States.
How much is it to ask that we use the facilities;
who but ourself would hesitate? Certainly not our firstborn,
who, when a toddler, never did so before barging in
on our privacy. (This too, so long ago, may have contributed
to the shaky condition of our bladder.) We should not
ask at all; we should announce, by fiat, our intention.
The door is unlikely to be locked. No one would be aghast,
for there is not a prima donna in the house: such are
the permissions of domestic familiarity. Nor are we
or any member of the family inclined to give excessive
priority to propriety in this house, where the men are
likely to come to dinner in their undershorts, and our
daughter to wear as street clothes what most women would
deem inappropriate for private lounging.
Why is it then, that when we form a fist before
the door we cannot bring ourself to make contact in
such crude fashion? It seems intrusive, so that at the
last moment we resort to stealth; for if the door is
unlocked, then knocking is not a functional prerequisite
to entry, and we need not disturb whomever now occupies
the bathroom; we only need perform one humble function,
after all. If a shower is in progress-as the sounds
we hear would now indicate-the curtain might preserve
discretion. (We have heard that in fancy European hotels,
bath and bidet are altogether separate spheres of activity.)
Yes, clearly an outburst is unnecessary; obtaining the
far more modest objective should be our focus-so intent
a focus, in fact, by this point, that we cannot waste
a moment in knocking, or for that matter looking at
what lies before us as we make our way, purposefully,
through the steam, to lower the toilet seat-always raised,
it seems-to sit in mingled pain and relief of micturition-damn,
blood again ( we did not mean to swear out loud)-this
is the consequence of trying to train one’s bladder;
our organs are not circus animals, after all; we should
not wait so long; we are ridiculous; our dubious heroism
is destructive; will we ever learn?
In our vexation, and then resignation, we raise
our eyes to see, in the corner, our husband, his back
to us. He makes rapid movements with his hand, his elbow
pumping up and down: gestures which, when he turns his
head to see who has sworn, turn furtive; but when he
continues, too intent on his objective to cease, he
cannot stifle his expression of catharsis: an ecstatic
sound we can barely recall from his mouth as his own
momentarily vertical stream finds more joyful release.
We applaud; we blow him a kiss, surprising him.
(Never were we one to resent the good fortune of others,
no matter the contrast with our own circumstance.) He
is unsure of how to react; he had not expected an audience,
particularly not our approval, is suspicious of it,
we would guess. And then we see, through the admittedly
obnubilating mist, that all of them are present: in
our company, in the bathroom-though removed, at the
same time, preoccupied. Their distance, however, has
a different quality than usual. Through the semitransparent
curtain we see the most curious silhouettes: flawless,
agile bodies, as if in choreographed ensemble, seen
through scrim: dramatic, seductive, mesmerizing. The
vision seems to have one hundred arms, like the Indian
goddess, so swift and graceful are their movements.
How much we wish to peel away the membrane separating
beauty from beholder.
And is there obstacle? No greater than there
was to opening the door. Although our mission is, as
it were, accomplished, we are transfixed; we cannot
make ourself depart. Gently, stealthily, we draw back
the curtain. They will not be distracted by its whisper,
so engaged are they in their activities, which, when
unsheathed, seem both ordinary and exalted. Has the
mist begun to dissipate, or have our eyes begun to adjust?
It would seem some seal was broken when we first opened
the door.
Uninterrupted, and un-self-conscious in their
nakedness, the group of them are painting on the tiles,
in flamboyant brushstrokes, what appears to be a mural;
the scene seems tropical, lush, idyllic. It seems, in
fact, to expand before our eyes. A small child we have
never seen before completes the party, molding a tower
of the waterlogged remains of the transparent bar in
the soap dish: quite an impressive edifice; his eyes
wide before his own accomplishment. Our daughter’s leg,
meanwhile, is raised as if in pirouette, as he, the
one for whom she spent the evening "dressing," glides
a manual razor tenderly, deftly, up her calf, making,
eventually, a circle around her leg, while she attempts
to do the same procedure to his face and upper lip.
Given the awkwardness of synchronizing his head down,
her hand above, they take, eventually, to lying down,
reclining the length of their bodies in the bath, despite
the waterfall that rains down upon them all the while,
in order to make the mutual gesture. Then, when the
flesh of face and calf are silken-smooth, each, facing
the other, dangles one foot out of the tub, while taking
clippers to each toenail in sequence. There is not a
nick for all the contact with sharp instruments, not
a drop of blood.
The unfamiliar child has completed his slippery
castle and embraces it to slide down, finding the slender
clippings piled on the side of the tub; he marvels at
them as if they were luminous seashells at the beach;
perhaps he contemplates including them in his composition
as a decorative addition. Instead, he blows into a plastic
flute, making surprisingly articulate tones. Is that
our eldest son behind him, building a boat, with more
alacrity than we have ever witnessed him exhibit? And
more skill. In less than a minute, it seems, he has
crafted the bow, the stern, the ship entire; then down
the drain he sails, a disappearing act; even the others
are momentarily distracted from their independent activities
to gape, as when a woman is sawed in half by a magician.
No sooner has he submerged than he resurfaces, only
to repeat the cycle over and over, the others applauding
at each completion of his round trip.
Our husband, meanwhile, who initially drew our
eye, having completed his goal, is celebrating with
acrobatic maneuvers of even greater magnitude: swinging
from the curtain rod-hopefully sturdy enough-with the
dexterity of a professional; movements of which we never
knew him capable. After he has warmed up with a series
of chin-ups-the bar, too, seems to have a resilience
beyond the ordinary-he does more intricate balletic
maneuvers, employing his hands as if they were feet;
his feet as if hands. We cannot, again, restrain ourself
from applauding, and he seems less self-conscious, less
ambivalent, in this mode than before.
But lest we embarrass or intimidate or compromise
him with our gaze, we let our eyes wander to the other
members of the troupe. Our daughter’s boyfriend is now
vigorously lathering her hair. How attractive she is
without makeup. If only the world could glimpse her
freshness: to see the sweet serenity behind the harsher
mask. By the same token, our son, for the first time
since adolescence, appears not to be slouching.
We have fallen into paradise through the most
mundane of circumstances. How lovely to think of the
effortless transformations! We cannot wait to view our
own, which surely, by osmosis, must occur. With a facecloth
from the linen closet we wipe the mirror of steam, quickly,
before it has a chance to form again. We will smile
at the image of ourself, with lips like those we see
on these exalted faces, lips resembling ripest summer
fruit. How wondrous is the world and its discoveries!
But the mouth that looks back at us from the
defogged reflective surface is, on the contrary, brittle,
and the nostrils above, thin and severe. We whimper
to see the wrinkles, even more numerous than we had
imagined, the deeply furrowed brow, and the puffiness
of the lids that can only partially mask the icy candor
of our once quite striking blue eyes.
|